Ex-NVIDIA Advisor Claims $1B in Stock, Settlement Rejected

Eric Gullichsen, a former NVIDIA technical advisor, says he's owed $1 billion in stock due to a 1993 options dispute. NVIDIA reportedly rejected his settlement offer.
Imagine checking some old paperwork and realizing you might be owed a billion dollars. That's the wild situation Eric Gullichsen, a former member of NVIDIA's technical advisory board, says he's in. He claims the company owes him around $1 billion in stock, all because of a decades-old options agreement. And according to his blog post, NVIDIA isn't interested in settling.
Here's the backstory. Gullichsen says he received 25,000 options on September 9, 1993. Fast forward to 2024, when he re-read the grant documents. The cover page he signed stated: "All shares shall vest upon the expiration of one year from Grant Date." That means the options would vest quarterly over one year, fully owned by September 9, 1994.
But there's a twist. An undated invitation letter signed by Jensen Huang supposedly said the options "vest over 4 years." The cover page also noted that if there's a conflict, the attached legal terms take precedence and override all previous written agreements. So which one wins? That's the million-dollar question – or rather, the billion-dollar one.
Then there's the paper trail from 1996. On April 16, 1996, a letter from then-CFO Marcel Gani confirmed that Gullichsen had vested 15,625 shares. That's exactly 62.5% of 25,000, which lines up with 10 out of 16 quarters – a four-year quarterly vesting schedule. But Gullichsen argues that if the one-year cover page terms applied, he should have vested an additional 9,375 shares.
After accounting for NVIDIA's 480x stock split, that 9,375 becomes roughly 4.5 million shares. At NVIDIA's closing price of $225.07 on September 25, those shares would be worth about $1.01 billion. Yeah, billion with a B.
Gullichsen hired a contingency lawyer and spent about a year going back and forth with NVIDIA's legal team. They eventually met, and Gullichsen proposed a settlement far below the $1 billion figure. NVIDIA refused. His lawyers reportedly think the statute of limitations has long passed and that the exercise window closed back in July 1996. So this might be a tough fight.
What do you think? Is Gullichsen owed a fortune, or is this a case of too little, too late? Let us know in the comments.
📰 Related Articles
What The Dark Queen of Mortholme's December 3 Launch Means f…
Console players on PS5, Xbox Series, and Switch get same-day access to Mosu's side-scrolling adventure, adding another December 3 option to a crowded release window.
What Lionel Rafale Means for Virtua Fighter Crossroads Playe…
A new character reveal keeps hype building for Virtua Fighter Crossroads and gives players another fighter to speculate about ahead of launch.
What 'Sentinel' Could Mean for Elder Scrolls VI Players
If accurate, the reported subtitle gives fans their first real naming detail since the 2018 teaser and fuels speculation about the game's setting, though nothing is confirmed until Bethesda speaks.
What Leaf Blower Co.'s Console Launch Means for Sim Fans
The console release puts Leaf Blower Co. in front of a wider audience and gives simulation fans a new current-gen option to look forward to on November 13.
What a Netflix PUBG Series Means for Fans
A Netflix adaptation could introduce PUBG to a whole new audience beyond gamers, while giving existing fans a fresh way to experience the franchise.
What the Resonance of Fate Remaster Means for RPG Fans
The remaster gives a cult-classic RPG a new audience on PS5 and PC, and signals that tri-Ace is revisiting its back catalog.